tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7333991649672303972.post5064266284958806411..comments2007-03-23T16:14:46.622-07:00That Bootleg Guyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03840720779725600492bootleg_ajc@yahoo.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7333991649672303972.post-5545575799847857822007-03-23T15:06:00.000-07:002007-03-23T15:06:00.000-07:00I think that "doink" and "hump" are acceptable as well, but Tracy doesn't agree. She agrees that they are funny words that do not put her in the mood, but she could care less about committing said acts.<BR/><BR/>I need to get laid.Shawnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07010808222931077185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7333991649672303972.post-1276141628438323782007-03-21T19:59:00.000-07:002007-03-21T19:59:00.000-07:00"I ruined her."<BR/><BR/>I love that one, Aaron. And, if I may invoke the spirit of Peter Griffin, "plow" is a perfectly acceptable euphemism as well.duncnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7333991649672303972.post-53567191928168016602007-03-21T10:25:00.000-07:002007-03-21T10:25:00.000-07:00I've been in the copy of Cam when he's used "destroyed", "ruin" and "annihilate" in place of the f-word. I think these ALL work, with a gold star especially for "annihilate" which I've co-opted as well.<BR/><BR/>And, yes, ladies...I'm still single.that mexican guynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7333991649672303972.post-64442333329692501632007-03-21T10:19:00.000-07:002007-03-21T10:19:00.000-07:00I like "knowing" in the biblical sense. I know Jennifer. I know her well. I hope she has more stupid friends so you can turn this into a regular feature.Greghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14918280215208070712noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7333991649672303972.post-23220005457943430402007-03-21T06:02:00.000-07:002007-03-21T06:02:00.000-07:00Long time lurker, first time poster. Just wanted to say how much I dig your work and all the readers posts that are just as funny.<BR/><BR/>It might be because I'm barely in my 20's, but "nail" is rude, low brow and still perfectly acceptable. I hear "poke" sometimes, but that doesn't properly convey the urgency of the moment.<BR/><BR/>Why not let The Nutty Professor be our guide and call it "having relations"?Jarrodnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7333991649672303972.post-71905729074601230842007-03-21T00:03:00.000-07:002007-03-21T00:03:00.000-07:00I think that "laid" is more of a "you need to..." type phrase. For instance if someone where to, oh let's say, be on a multi year abstaining from sex thing, people might suggest that said person "get laid." <BR/><BR/>If we're talking future tense I usually go with "hit" or "catch one" as in "I wouldn't mind hitting that" or "she could catch one." <BR/><BR/>If we're talking present or past tense, I'm all about the shag. "We shagged once or twice." "Oh, they're shagging." <BR/><BR/>Oh, and glad to see you're still getting email. Or is that "your still getting email?"mathannoreply@blogger.com